|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
1 School of Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, England; email: jwm1{at}mail.soc.soton.ac.uk
2 Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, P.O. Box 509, Albany, N.Y. 12201, USA; and Department of Biomedical Sciences, The University at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222; email: bowser{at}wadsworth.org
Non-vital staining, especially with rose Bengal, has been widely used in ecological studies to differentiate between the tests of dead (unstained) foraminifera from those presumed to be living at the time of collection (stained). Doubts have been expressed about staining methods because of the possibility that dead individuals may retain undecayed protoplasm for weeks or months after death; when stained, such individuals would be recorded as living. To assess the importance of such false positives, it is necessary to examine rates of mortality, and the modes of generation of empty tests, i.e., whether due to reproduction, growth stages (leaving empty tests during growth) or death. It can be argued that reproduction, ontogeny, and death through predation lead to tests devoid of protoplasm. Whereas reproduction may affect only a small proportion of the population of each species (due to high pre-reproductive mortality), predation in oxygenated environments may be responsible for the major part of that pre-reproductive mortality. In oxygenated environments, disease or adverse environmental conditions are most likely to lead to dead individuals having tests containing protoplasm. In dysaerobic/anoxic environments, predation by macrofauna may be excluded, so foraminifera die through other causes and thus more tests with dead protoplasm may be potentially available for staining. Therefore, for most other environments, the problem of staining dead individuals is almost certainly overstated. Furthermore, from comparative studies, it seems that the most commonly used technique (staining with rose Bengal) is as reliable as others. Now that new vital staining techniques, especially the use of fluorescent probes, are being introduced, it is timely for further objective comparative studies of all techniques to be made in order to evaluate data already gathered and to develop the best strategies for future ecological studies according to whether they are field-based or experimental.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. du Chatelet, D. Degre, P.-G. Sauriau, and J.-P. Debenay Distribution of living benthic foraminifera in relation with environmental variables within the Aiguillon cove (Atlantic coast, France): improving knowledge for paleoecological interpretation Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, March 1, 2009; 180(2): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tomasovych and S. M. Kidwell Fidelity of variation in species composition and diversity partitioning by death assemblages: time-averaging transfers diversity from beta to alpha levels Paleobiology, January 1, 2009; 35(1): 94 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Armynot du Chatelet, P. Recourt, and V. Chopin Mineralogy of agglutinated benthic foraminifera; implications for paleo-environmental reconstructions Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, November 1, 2008; 179(6): 583 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Polovodova and J. Schonfeld FORAMINIFERAL TEST ABNORMALITIES IN THE WESTERN BALTIC SEA Journal of Foraminiferal Research, October 1, 2008; 38(4): 318 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Thomsen and T. L. Rasmussen COCCOLITH-AGGLUTINATING FORAMINIFERA FROM THE EARLY CRETACEOUS AND HOW THEY CONSTRUCTED THEIR TESTS Journal of Foraminiferal Research, July 1, 2008; 38(3): 193 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Cage and W. E. N. Austin Seasonal dynamics of coastal water masses in a Scottish fjord and their potential influence on benthic foraminiferal shell geochemistry Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 303(1): 155 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rossignol, C. Dupuy, PY. Pascal, and J.-P. Debenay HYDROBIA ULVAE: A DEPOSIT-FEEDER FOR CLEANING LIVING HARD-SHELLED FORAMINIFERA Journal of Foraminiferal Research, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 8 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Duchemin, C. Fontanier, F. J. Jorissen, C. Barras, and C. Griveaud LIVING SMALL-SIZED (63-150 {micro}m) FORAMINIFERA FROM MID-SHELF TO MID-SLOPE ENVIRONMENTS IN THE BAY OF BISCAY Journal of Foraminiferal Research, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 12 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lehmann, R. Rottger, and J. Hohenegger LIFE CYCLE VARIATION INCLUDING TRIMORPHISM IN THE FORAMINIFER TROCHAMMINA INFLATA FROM NORTH EUROPEAN SALT MARSHES Journal of Foraminiferal Research, October 1, 2006; 36(4): 279 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schonfeld TAXONOMY AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE UVIGERINA PEREGRINA PLEXUS IN THE TROPICAL TO NORTHEASTERN ATLANTIC Journal of Foraminiferal Research, October 1, 2006; 36(4): 355 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. de Nooijer, I. A. P. Duijnstee, and G. J. van der Zwaan NOVEL APPLICATION OF MTT REDUCTION: A VIABILITY ASSAY FOR TEMPERATE SHALLOW-WATER BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA Journal of Foraminiferal Research, July 1, 2006; 36(3): 195 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Roe and R. T. Patterson DISTRIBUTION OF THECAMOEBIANS (TESTATE AMOEBAE) IN SMALL LAKES AND PONDS, BARBADOS, WEST INDIES Journal of Foraminiferal Research, April 1, 2006; 36(2): 116 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ernst, R. Bours, I. Duijnstee, and B. van der Zwaan EXPERIMENTAL EFFECTS OF AN ORGANIC MATTER PULSE AND OXYGEN DEPLETION ON A BENTHIC FORAMINIFERAL SHELF COMMUNITY Journal of Foraminiferal Research, July 1, 2005; 35(3): 177 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Duchemin, F. J. Jorissen, F. Andrieux-Loyer, F. Le Loc'h, C. Hily, and X. Philippon LIVING BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA FROM "LA GRANDE VASIERE", FRENCH ATLANTIC CONTINENTAL SHELF: FAUNAL COMPOSITION AND MICROHABITATS Journal of Foraminiferal Research, July 1, 2005; 35(3): 198 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Buzas-Stephens and M. A. Buzas POPULATION DYNAMICS AND DISSOLUTION OF FORAMINIFERA IN NUECES BAY, TEXAS Journal of Foraminiferal Research, July 1, 2005; 35(3): 248 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Culver and B. P. Horton INFAUNAL MARSH FORAMINIFERA FROM THE OUTER BANKS, NORTH CAROLINA, U.S.A. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, April 1, 2005; 35(2): 148 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Horton and R. J. Edwards The application of local and regional transfer functions to the reconstruction of Holocene sea levels, north Norfolk, England The Holocene, February 1, 2005; 15(2): 216 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Horton, J. E. Whittaker, K. H. Thomson, M. I. J. Hardbattle, A. Kemp, S. A. Woodroffe, and M. R. Wright THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MODERN FORAMINIFERAL DATA SET FOR SEA-LEVEL RECONSTRUCTIONS, WAKATOBI MARINE NATIONAL PARK, SOUTHEAST SULAWESI, INDONESIA Journal of Foraminiferal Research, January 1, 2005; 35(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Buzas-Stephens, P. Buzas-Stephens, E. A. Pessagno Jr., and C. J. Bowen FORAMINIFERAL RESPONSE TO HABITAT DISRUPTION: ARROYO COLORADO, TEXAS Journal of Foraminiferal Research, October 1, 2003; 33(4): 294 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Licari, S. Schumacher, F. Wenzhofer, M. Zabel, and A. Mackensen COMMUNITIES AND MICROHABITATS OF LIVING BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA FROM THE TROPICAL EAST ATLANTIC: IMPACT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTIVITY REGIMES Journal of Foraminiferal Research, January 1, 2003; 33(1): 10 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |