Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; July 2002; v. 32; no. 3; p. 245-251; DOI: 10.2113/32.3.245
© 2002 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kandiano, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bauch, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

IMPLICATIONS OF PLANKTIC FORAMINIFERAL SIZE FRACTIONS FOR THE GLACIAL-INTERGLACIAL PALEOCEANOGRAPHY OF THE POLAR NORTH ATLANTIC

E. S. Kandiano1,3 and H. A. Bauch2

1 Graduate School "Dynamics of Global Cycles within the System Earth" at GEOMAR, University of Kiel, GEOMAR, Wischhofstrasse 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany. E-mail: ekandian{at}geomar.de
2 GEOMAR Research Center for Marine Geosciences, also at Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstrasse, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany. E-mail: hbauch{at}geomar.de

3 Corresponding author.

Foraminiferal abundances derived from different mesh-size fractions were investigated from the polar North Atlantic for the time interval of the later part of marine oxygen isotope (MIS) 8 into early MIS 7 and the last 30 cal. ka in order to select the most representative fraction for paleoceanographic applications. The records cover the time interval with quite different glacial-interglacial climatic conditions. Whereas the interval of MIS 8–7 represents "intermediate" glacial-interglacial conditions, the younger core section characterizes more extreme climatic conditions consisting of the rather cold last glacial maximum (LGM) and the very warmer Holocene.

The records from MIS 8 to 7 show that the larger size fractions (125–250 µm, >150 µm) reveal almost monospecific assemblages of the polar species Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (s), indicating a prevalence of cold polar-like surface water conditions during this time. By contrast, the smaller size fractions (100–150 µm, 80–150 µm) exhibit considerable increase of the subpolar species Turborotalita quinqueloba, which is representative of inflow of Atlantic water into the polar North Atlantic. In these smaller fractions, the two species show a strong negative correlation with respect to changes in glacial-interglacial conditions. Although T. quinqueloba yielded sufficiently high numbers of total specimens in the two smallest fractions, which makes this species useful for interpreting temporal water mass alterations, the relative abundance changes in the 80–150 µm are twice as large as in the 100–150 µm fraction. Size fraction faunal analysis covering the last 30 cal. ka revealed occurrences of small-sized T. quinqueloba (80–150 µm) in the LGM interval, indicating seasonally open water conditions during this time. This finding demonstrates the advantage of employing small-sized fractions for paleoceanographic reconstructions of periods when relatively cold conditions prevailed in the Nordic seas.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research