Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; October 2006; v. 36; no. 4; p. 291-314; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.36.4.291
© 2006 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quilty, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hosie, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

MODERN FORAMINIFERA, SWAN RIVER ESTUARY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA: DISTRIBUTION AND CONTROLLING FACTORS

Patrick G. Quilty1 and Graham Hosie2

1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia. E-mail: P.Quilty{at}utas.edu.au
2 Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia

Sediment samples have been examined from 51 locations between the Narrows Bridge and Fremantle Harbour in the Swan River estuary. All have yielded foraminifera and all but one provided data in which distinctive trends can be recognized.

Foraminiferal number (number of specimens in 10 g dry weight of sample) decreases upstream until near Narrows Bridge, where it increases again. Values are >2500 for most samples through Fremantle Harbour to Blackwall Reach and just past Point Walter. The higher numbers correlate with the outside of the bends in the river, reflecting a higher energy, more marine influence. The highest value is ~10,000 at Station 2. Values of 500–2500 occur in the inside of the river bends between Fremantle and Blackwall Reach, probably correlating with a slightly lower energy environment. There is a separate region of 500–2500 values in a narrow strip from the Narrows Bridge into Melville Water, probably due to the influx of river-borne nutrients; the composition of faunas contributing to this high value is quite different from that between Fremantle and Blackwall Reach. Two regions of lower values (100–500 and <100) are recognizable, both confined to Melville Water, the lower values apparently coinciding with the mud-filled basin of the river. In the Fremantle Harbour - Blackwall Reach section of the river, Ammonia cf. aoteana (Finlay) makes up <5% of the foraminiferal fauna, but >50% of faunas near the Narrows Bridge and in most of Melville Water, excluding the shallower parts particularly to the northwest. In contrast to A. cf. aoteana, miliolids make up >50% of faunas in the southern side of Blackwall Reach and extend just into Melville Water. They make up <5% of the fauna where A. cf. aoteana is >50%. The inverse relationship between A. cf. aoteana and miliolids is very marked. Elphidium constitutes up to 90% of the foraminiferal fauna, but this polyspecific estuarine genus is concentrated towards the marine end of the estuary. Diversity in foraminifera decreases and dominance increases upstream.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research