Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; July 2007; v. 37; no. 3; p. 213-222; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.37.3.213
© 2007 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsook, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

POPULATION DENSITIES AND DIVERSITIES OF EPIPHYTAL FORAMINIFERA ON NEARSHORE SUBSTRATES, NEVIS, WEST INDIES

Brent Wilson1 and Ann Ramsook2

Petroleum Geoscience Unit, Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad, West Indies

1 Correspondence author. E-mail: bwilson{at}eng.uwi.tt

Foraminiferal population densities and diversities were monitored on calcareous algae and seagrass in two Caribbean bays, one of which has been polluted by a leaking septic tank, and samples were collected monthly over a year-long period. Population densities on seagrass blades were measured using the mass of dried leaves. On other substrates, population densities were computed as the number of foraminifera per gram of detritus (diatom frustrules, sand, particulate organic matter) washed from the plants. Densities on the heads (capitulae) of the alga Penicillus capitatus in both bays were three times higher than those on either the alga Halimeda opuntia or on exposed seagrass (Syringodium filiforme, Thalassia testinudum) rhizomes and basal leaf bosses. The input of organic matter into one bay may have impacted the assemblage species composition, but it did not affect population densities. The short life span of P. capitatus, coupled with the more dense populations it supports, implies that assemblages on this alga may contribute proportionally more foraminiferal tests to the sediment than do those on other plants.

Population dynamics showed that entire foraminiferal communities on all plants fluctuated independently of one another, whether on different plants in the same bay or on the same plants in different bays. This suggests that nearshore foraminifera are patchily distributed and that the populations in the patches wax and wane independently. Population diversities fluctuated from month to month and were significantly higher in the polluted bay. However, monthly diversities and population densities were not correlated. Species dominance was greater in the windward, unpolluted bay. Differences in dominance within each bay suggest that Penicillus capitatus capitulae support a pioneering foraminiferal community, whereas long-lived seagrass rhizomes bear a climax community.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research