Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; January 2008; v. 38; no. 1; p. 23-38; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.1.23
© 2008 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Araújo, H. A. B.
Right arrow Articles by De Jesus Machado, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOUTH BAHIA CORAL REEFS, BRAZIL

Helisângela Acris Borges De Araújo1 and Altair De Jesus Machado2,3

1 Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Caetano Moura, 123, Federação, CEP: 40210-340, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
2 Av. Cardeal da Silva, 32, Apt° 101, Federação, 40.220-141, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

3 Correspondence author. E-mail: altair{at}ufba.br

The objective of this study was to assess foraminiferal faunas and their relationship to sediment texture and composition in the reef areas from the coastline to the 30-m isobath between the cities of Corumbau and Nova Viçosa in the extreme south of the State of Bahia. Cluster analysis of the species, identified from 38 samples of surface sediments, revealed a strong correlation with grain size. The principal relationships established between these species and the sediments were the following: (i) Amphistegina lessonii and Peneroplis carinatus were abundant in sandy carbonate sediments and (ii) Ammonia beccarii, Elphidium poeyanum, Pyrgo subsphaerica, Quinqueloculina disparilis curta and Q. lamarckiana were abundant in mixed sand and mud, whether carbonate or mixed carbonate and siliciclastic. The fluctuation in the richness index among samples indicated microenvironmental areas that were unfavorable for some foraminiferal species. Local hydrodynamic conditions result in environments with greater energy where finer sediments, together with many foraminiferal species, have been removed. In more protected areas, weaker hydrodynamic conditions permit the accumulation of fine sediments and organic matter, making the environment suitable for diverse forms of foraminifera. In general, faunal composition is typical of tropical carbonate platforms, where the reef structures provide a variety of microenvironments that account for the variations observed in the foraminiferal fauna.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research