Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

FORAMINIFERS AS HARD SUBSTRATES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE WASHINGTON (USA) CONTINENTAL SHELF OF SMALLER FORAMINIFERS ATTACHED TO LARGER, AGGLUTINATE FORAMINIFERS

Department of Earth and Space Sciences and the Burke Museum, University of Washington, P.O. Box 353010, Seattle, WA 98195-3010., E-mail: ruthm2{at}u.washington.edu

This study from the continental shelf offshore from Washington, USA, describes an occurrence of attached foraminifers using other, larger foraminifers as their hard substrate. Isolated instances of such associations have been illustrated in a few publications; however, the example documented here is of an extensive relationship between smaller attached foraminifers and their substrate species. Host foraminifers were unusually large (4 mm to 5 cm) specimens of the agglutinate species Ammodiscus pacificus, Haplophragmoides canariensis, Rhabdammina linearis and Bathysiphon filiformis. The attached foraminifers were Cibicides pseudoungerianus, Tritaxis fusca and Cibicides refulgens. In addition to the attached foraminiferal tests, several attachment scars were evident, some of which can be attributed to epibiont foraminifers that became detached from the host.

There are several possible reasons these smaller foraminifers colonized the larger ones in this area. Most likely, the host foraminifers provided a stable platform for feeding. In addition, if the host was living, its motility could have prevented the smaller foraminifers from being smothered in this high sediment accumulation setting. Thus, these larger foraminifers act as convenient "benthic islands" (Taylor and Wilson, 2003) for their epibionts.