Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; July 2008; v. 38; no. 3; p. 215-227; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.3.215
© 2008 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinz, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hemleben, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

LIVE BENTHIC FORAMINIFERAL ASSEMBLAGES AT THE PACIFIC CONTINENTAL MARGIN OF COSTA RICA AND NICARAGUA

Petra Heinz*, Wiebke Ruschmeier and Christoph Hemleben

Institute of Geosciences, Tübingen University, Sigwartstr. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Correspondence author. E-mail: petra.heinz{at}uni-tuebingen.de

Living (rose-Bengal-stained) foraminifera were investigated from the continental margin off the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Assemblages from seven stations, including mounds and mud volcanoes, were compared in terms of foraminiferal density, distribution patterns, diversity and species composition and related to environmental factors (satellite chlorophyll a imagery, organic carbon content in the sediment, available oxygen data, particle grain sizes). Sediments from mud volcanoes and mounds did not show direct influence of seepage. Highest foraminiferal densities were found on the slope off Nicaragua. The lowest foraminiferal densities were found in the north off Costa Rica where the smooth Cocos Plate segment subducts beneath the Caribbean Plate. Intermediate values were counted in the southern investigated area, where the down-going plate has a rough topography. Observed foraminiferal densities did not always correspond to chlorophyll a imagery or measured organic carbon content in the sediment, suggesting a possible influence of time-limited food supply, lateral transport of sinking organic material and local variability in the investigated area. In total, 187 species were recognized, distributed across the seven stations, which all showed high diversity. Foraminiferal associations contained many Buliminida, pointing to low-oxygen concentrations at the sediment-water interface. Some taxa indicated a possible bathymetric or regional limitation. The assemblage composition varied among the stations to such a degree that no commonalities were identified, based on results from multivariate analysis. This was also the case for samples originating from mounds and mud volcanoes, which did not show any outstandingly different assemblages, meaning that no characteristic foraminiferal assemblage could be used to identify these areas. This mosaic-like distribution pointed to a large degree of habitat heterogeneity in the relatively small area; the habitat heterogeneity could explain the overall high diversity of benthic foraminifera in the region.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research