Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; July 2008; v. 38; no. 3; p. 228-250; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.3.228
© 2008 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Blasco, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

MODERN BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA IN THE SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE BEAUFORT SHELF, SLOPE AND MACKENZIE TROUGH, BEAUFORT SEA, CANADA: TAXONOMY AND SUMMARY OF SURFICIAL DISTRIBUTIONS

David B. Scott1,4, Trecia Schell1, André Rochon2 and Steve Blasco3

1 Centre for Environmental and Marine Geology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H3J5, Canada.
2 ISMER, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Quebec G5L 3A1, Canada.
3 Natural Resources Canada, 1 Challenger Drive, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y4A2, Canada.

4 Correspondence author. E-mail: David.Scott{at}Dal.Ca

This paper reviews some new data on distribution patterns of modern benthic foraminifera and related organisms from the Canadian Arctic, specifically the Beaufort Shelf and slope. The smaller sizes—45–63 µm as well as >63 µm—were examined, and it was discovered that many species had either been overlooked altogether or severely underrepresented in previous studies. Not surprisingly, the deep-sea forms in particular had been overlooked even though they are present in the shallow shelf sediments in significant numbers. Although the data show many of the same species as previous studies, improved techniques of sample processing greatly increased the numbers of specimens and species found, enhancing the spatial and faunal relationships. These new data change the known faunas and will allow a much more precise indication for paleoenvironmental studies than was previously available. However, the major focus of this paper is taxonomy and illustration of most of these species to update the taxonomy last done in the 1990’s. One new species is reported, Cyclogyra distincta Cole and Scott, and Komokiacea (excluding Rhizammina algaeformis Brady) are reported from the Arctic for the first time as well as a southern immigrant, Elphidiella hannai (Cushman and Grant), which appears to thrive in methane-rich environments in the Arctic.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research