Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; October 2008; v. 38; no. 4; p. 277-291; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.4.277
© 2008 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finger, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lipps, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

FORAMINIFERA USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF MIOCENE POLYCHAETE WORM TUBES, MONTEREY FORMATION, CALIFORNIA, USA

Kenneth L. Finger1,5, Megan M. Flenniken2,3 and Jere H. Lipps1,4

1 Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 91720-4780 USA.
2 Biological Sciences Department, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadley, MA 01075 USA.
4 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 91720-4780 USA.

5 Correspondence author. E-mail: kfinger{at}berkeley.edu

Unusual concentrations of foraminiferal tests interpreted to be the remnants of worm tubes occur in the Miocene Monterey Formation near Carmel and Mission Viejo, California. Lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic correlations firmly establish their ages as late middle Miocene near Carmel and early late Miocene at Mission Viejo. The foraminifera indicate deposition occurred at bathyal depths. Surrounding strata are fine-grained, thin bedded and lack heavy bioturbation, features typical of the siliceous facies of the upper Monterey Formation and indicative of disaerobic conditions.

The foraminiferal concentrations are arranged in tube-like shapes similar to those constructed by some modern marine worms. Because agglutinated worm tubes readily disaggregate after the worm’s death, very few tubes have been found in the fossil record. In addition, although some modern worms construct their tubes using foraminiferal tests, the fossil record of this phenomenon to date is represented by a single specimen from the Lias (Lower Jurassic). The fossil tubes from the Miocene of California have closest affinity with the polychaete worm genus Pectinaria, which includes Recent species living at littoral to abyssal depths. Foraminiferal tests were likely the predominant sand-sized particles available to worms in the Miocene environments, thus the worms likely did not purposefully select foraminiferal tests. Low-oxygen conditions might have enhanced the potential for tube preservation, but subsequent leaching at the Carmel localities removed most calcareous test material from the sediment.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research