Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; October 2008; v. 38; no. 4; p. 305-317; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.38.4.305
© 2008 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Hengstum, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gabriel, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

THECAMOEBIANS (TESTATE AMOEBAE) AND FORAMINIFERA FROM THREE ANCHIALINE CENOTES IN MEXICO: LOW SALINITY (1.5–4.5 psu) FAUNAL TRANSITIONS

P. J. Van Hengstum1, E. G. Reinhardt, P. A. Beddows, R. J. Huang and J. J. Gabriel

School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1

1 Correspondence author. Current Address: Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J1, Canada. E-mail: vanhengstum{at}dal.ca

This study presents the first systematic documentation of thecamoebians and foraminifera in anchialine cenotes (sinkholes) from Quintana Roo, Mexico. Thirty-three surface sediment samples (upper 5 cm) were collected from cenotes Carwash (1.5 psu), Maya Blue (2.9 psu) and El Eden (>3.3 psu). Q-mode cluster analysis of the faunal distributions isolated four low-diversity (Shannon diversity index 1.0–1.5) and salinity-controlled assemblages. Assemblage 1 (1.5 psu) is dominated by the thecamoebians Centropyxis aculeata "aculeata" (53%) and Arcella vulgaris (21%). Assemblage 2 (2.9 ± 0.2 psu) is dominated by Centropyxis aculeata "discoides" (41%) and Centropyxis aculeata "aculeata" (27%). Dwarfed (~50 µm) Centropyxis constricta "aerophila" (20%) with an autogenous test and Jadammina macrescens (29%) dominate Assemblage 3 (3.4 ± 0.2 psu). Finally, Ammonia tepida (51%), Tritaxis sp. (29%) and Elphidium sp. (11%) dominate Assemblage 4 (3.7 ± 0.4 psu). Thecamoebian and foraminiferal populations in the subtropical cenotes are distributed according to salinity variations as found in other temperate paralic systems. The centropyxid taxa trended towards ecophenotypes without spines with increasing salinity, and dwarfed and autogenous-shelled Centropyxis constricta "aerophila" were determined as the most euryhaline thecamoebian, persisting at the ecological boundary of the group (~3.3 psu). Importantly, the transition from a thecamoebian-dominated assemblage to a foraminiferan-dominated assemblage occurs at a salinity of approximately 3.5 psu.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research