Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Journal of Foraminiferal Research Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Journal of Foraminiferal Research; October 2009; v. 39; no. 4; p. 267-277; DOI: 10.2113/gsjfr.39.4.267
© 2009 Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ramirez, A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

LARGER FORAMINIFERS OF THE FLORIDA REEF TRACT, USA: DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS ON REEF-RUBBLE HABITATS

Rebekah Duncan Baker1, Pamela Hallock1,5, Elizabeth F. Moses1,2, Dana E. Williams1,3 and Alexa Ramirez1,4

1 College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 USA

5 Corresponding author: E-mail: pmuller{at}marine.usf.edu

Multi-year data sets for benthic populations of any taxa are particularly valuable in present conditions of rapid environmental change. This study examines distribution patterns and population densities of larger benthic foraminifers (LBF) from the Florida reef tract, specifically abundance data collected from reef rubble at offshore (1995–2000, 2006–07) and patch reefs (1996, 2000–02, 2006–07).

Six years (1995–2000) of data collected quarterly from two offshore reefs, Conch (at 10, 18, and 30 m) and Tennessee (at 8 and 20 m), reveal that assemblages of LBF primarily vary with habitat depth, reflecting available light, and water motion. Assemblages are dominated by Amphistegina gibbosa and Laevipeneroplis proteus, which tend to occur together, typically making up at least 40–50% of the assemblages. Both overall abundance and evenness of the assemblages exhibit the greatest variability at shallower depths, where environmental conditions tend to be more variable. Interannual variability reveals the resilience of populations of LBF following mortality events caused by bleaching and hurricanes.

Across the Keys, location along the reef tract, reef type (offshore-shallow [<10 m], offshore-deep ([10–30 m], or patch reefs [<10 m]), and symbiont type strongly influence assemblages of LBF. At upper Keys sites, assemblages share the highest degree of inter-reef similarity (73%), while Biscayne National Park (BNP) and lower Keys sites have the lowest inter-reef similarity (~60%). This difference likely reflects greater variability of habitats found in the latter areas, especially BNP patch reefs. Foraminiferal taxa hosting chlorophytes are typically more abundant in shallow waters than at offshore-deep sites. Taxa hosting diatoms, primarily A. gibbosa, are always dominant at depths of 10–30 m.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research